Another addition to my research on courage. In his
Spectator review of Tim Clayton's
Sea Wolves, James Delingpole describes the risks taken by British submariners in WWII:
Of all the Allied fighting service branches in which you wouldn’t
have wanted to spend the second world war, probably the grimmest was
submarines. Sure, their losses weren’t quite as bad as the German U-boat
fleet, where your chances of being killed were four in five. But in the
course of the war about one third of British submariners lost their
lives; and in the earlier years your chances of coming back from a
mission alive were no more than 50/50.
Bomber crews, of course, had to face similarly grim odds. But at least
they got back home to clean sheets, a hot shower, a beer and a fag or
two. On subs a patrol meant at the very least a fortnight in a foetid,
claustrophic hell of cramped, shared bunks and rank air sometimes
poisoned with chlorine gas, your clothes perpetually damp and stained
with oil, with no water to wash with, increasingly rotten food, and the
constant, nagging fear that at any second you could die one of the most
horrible deaths imaginable.
Depth-chargings were the worst. You could hear the propellers of the
destroyer thrumming louder and louder above you. Then came the agonising
wait. The enemy knew your position but not your depth, so your survival
depended on how deep they set the various charges to explode. Even a
miss was pretty traumatic: the noise, said one captain, was like being
‘in a 15-inch turret standing between the guns when the guns go off.’
The interior of the boat would become a fantastic blur of shaking as
paint shredded off the bulkheads and lights smashed. Then you’d hear
rivets popping and the hull groaning ominously and you’d wonder whether
or not you were about to burst at the seams.
|
(Click to Enlarge) |
Though the second-world-war subs were equipped with an escape hatch,
your Davis Submerged Escape Apparatus took ages to put on and was only
effective at depths of less than 100 feet (though someone did once
survive an escape at 171 feet below). More likely, if your sub was
damaged, you’d end up being torn apart as it sank to the bottom and
imploded. When the Italian destroyer Circe depth-charged P38 in the Med,
it knew it had scored a hit from what rose to the surface: first
bubbles and oil; later, ‘a polished cupboard door, a table top, a bag of
flags, a human lung’.
So what on earth possessed these sub-mariners to do it? Though it’s a
myth that they were all volunteers, the majority of them were drawn to
the Silent Service partly by its elitist mystique, partly by its much
higher pay (a little less than double the ordinary mariner’s rate) and
partly by its independence.
|
Lieutenant Commander George Phillips and the crew of the submarine HMS Ursula |
An ambitious officer could find himself with his own command at just 28
(and by 35 you were considered past it), while crews relished the
cameraderie and the unstuffiness. Discipline was adamantine, because the
slightest mistake by one man could destroy an entire crew. But there
was no space for the vile bullying or rank snobbery you still often
found on capital ships. Submariners relished their piratical
raffishness, returning to port after successful patrols by flying the
Jolly Roger.
Whether they lived or died was dependent above all on the skill and
nerve of their CO. A submarine was only as good as the tonnage it sank,
and torpedoing a ship required verve and daring bordering on the
suicidal. Commanders who failed to close and kill were quickly replaced:
it wasn’t a job for the squeamish. German U-boats may have
machine-gunned the crews of ships they’d just sunk but so, on occasion,
did British submariners. This was a war of attrition and there is little
space for prisoners on a sub.
Was it all worth it? In his gripping history Sea Wolves, Tim Clayton
argues that it was. He cites the claim, by Rommel’s chief- of-staff
Fritz Bayerlain, that it was British subs which really defeated the
Afrika Korps by destroying so many of their supply ships. But this was
achieved at the cost of 42 per cent of British submarines lost in the
Med alone. Many of these young men’s lives, it’s clear, were simply
thrown away by a naval establishment which never quite understood the
point of subs. Their radios and guns were poor; their supply of
torpedoes pitiful; and the missions they were sent on sometimes
suicidal, especially in the Baltic, in the summer, where the near
24-hour daylight made it impossible to surface safely by night and
recharge their batteries. Perhaps the pride of being in the Submarine
Service was the only real recompense.
No comments:
Post a Comment